Why AI-generated code quality problems compound into security risk
Developers using AI coding assistants wrote less secure code in 4 of 5 tasks in a 2023 Stanford study — and were more confident it was safe.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
Developers using AI coding assistants wrote less secure code in 4 of 5 tasks in a 2023 Stanford study — and were more confident it was safe.
The US revoked its AI safety EO in January 2025, but SBOM and evidence obligations under EO 14028 never went away — and the EU AI Act just got harder deadlines.
GitHub has disclosed that Copilot suggestions match training-set code verbatim about 1% of the time — and a class action over it is still being argued in 2026.
GitClear's 211M-line study found copy-pasted code rose from 8.3% to 12.3% of changes from 2020 to 2024 — even as AI reviewers flag more comments, the defects that matter most still slip through.
319 LLM patches for 64 real CVEs were graded in 2026: only 24.8% were both secure and functional. Speed without validation just merges bugs faster.
GitHub reports its Copilot Autofix suggestions resolve two-thirds of flagged vulnerabilities with little or no editing — but the other third is where merges go wrong.
Stanford researchers found developers using AI coding assistants wrote more security bugs — and felt more confident in them. Here's how to adopt AI safely.
AI agents can browse regional pricing, compare tiers, start a Stripe checkout, and verify activation — the entire Safeguard procurement journey now runs through the MCP server.
A practical buyer's guide to open source vulnerability database tools, CVE aggregation, and threat intel feeds for tracking OSS risk.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.