Safeguard
Solution · SaaS / Cloud-native

SaaS. Ship fast, answer questionnaires faster.

Cloud-native SaaS lives on a paradox: ship faster than ever, while answering more security questions than ever. Safeguard makes the evidence live, the gates fast, and the dependency-management backlog mostly automatic.

◈ the standing query — evidence answers on demand, not once a year
SOC 2
Continuous
<2m
PR-time scan
90%
Auto-fix coverage
Multi-region
Data residency
SaaS pressures

Velocity versus assurance.

Customer security questionnaires

Every B2B sale arrives with a 200-question security review. Sales velocity dies in the spreadsheet. Evidence has to be live and queryable, not assembled fresh each quarter.

Move-fast culture

Engineering will not accept gates that slow merge frequency. Security needs to live where developers already work — IDE and PR — not in a separate console no one opens.

Multi-region rollouts

GDPR, DPDP, CCPA, sectoral data laws — different jurisdictions, different data-residency rules, sometimes inside one product. You need policy per region, not a global toggle.

Open-source maintenance debt

Thousands of transitive dependencies on dozens of stacks. Keeping them current without burning the team out demands automation, not heroics.

How Safeguard fits

Built where your team already works.

Auto-fill customer questionnaires

Answers pulled from a live evidence store. SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, DPDP — every control narrative is a query against the platform, not a Friday afternoon.

PR-time Lion + Eagle keep the bar fast

Inline findings show up in seconds. Griffin only spends reasoning budget on candidates that actually warrant it. Developers stop feeling security as a tax.

Per-region policy + deployment

Run the platform in each region your data lives. Apply jurisdiction-specific policy gates. Audit log stays local; evidence is exportable cross-region.

Auto-fix PRs at scale

90% of low-risk version bumps applied automatically with passing tests. Engineers only review the non-trivial ones. The backlog stops being a backlog.

Compliance alignment

Frameworks the platform is mapped to.

SOC 2 Type II
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
GDPR
DPDP Act (India)
CCPA
HIPAA (where applicable)
PCI-DSS (where applicable)
Customer-specific frameworks
Reference architecture

A typical multi-region rollout.

  1. 01

    Multi-region shared cloud

    Eagle and Griffin Lite/S deployed per region. Inference, audit, and telemetry stay within the region for each customer cohort.

  2. 02

    Policy gate at CI/CD

    Per-repo policy mapped to product, region, and customer tier. PR comments back from the platform within seconds.

  3. 03

    Customer SBOM portal

    Read-only portal exposes signed CycloneDX SBOMs and VEX statements to your enterprise customers. No more emailed PDFs.

  4. 04

    TPRM on your vendors

    Continuous monitoring of every SaaS vendor you depend on. Alert when a tier-1 vendor SBOM contains a newly-published KEV CVE.

Where the risk lives today

Four surfaces where SaaS risk actually lives.

Customer security questionnaires

Every B2B sale is a 200-question security review. Engineering time is the bottleneck, and a stale questionnaire response stalls a six-figure ARR deal. Live evidence is the only scalable answer.

Move-fast culture

Security cannot be a gate that slows the merge rate; it has to live where developers already work. IDE and PR are the surfaces; a separate console no one opens is a budget line, not a control.

Multi-region deploys

GDPR, DPDP, CCPA, sectoral data laws — different jurisdictions, different residency rules, sometimes inside one product. Per-region policy is required, not a global toggle in a single config file.

Open-source dependency churn

Thousands of transitive deps across many stacks. Staying current without burning the team out is a system, not heroics. Auto-fix at scale is the only path that does not collapse into a backlog.

Current threat landscape

What is hitting cloud-native SaaS this year.

Customer SBOM requests from enterprise buyers

Procurement asks for signed CycloneDX with every renewal. Table stakes, not a differentiator.

Customer SBOM portal

Maintainer takeover of a popular OSS lib

A compromised publisher pushes a malicious release into your hot path within hours of release.

TPRM with component-level scoring

Typosquats and dependency confusion at install

npm and pypi attackers register lookalike names; one bad install reaches CI.

Lion install-time guardrails

Prompt-injection through customer content

Adversarial input flows from user-supplied data to MCP-server tool calls and exfiltrates context.

Guardian runtime guardrails

SOC 2 Type II continuous-evidence expectations

Annual audits give way to live-evidence reviews; the calendar is gone.

Compliance evidence pipeline
Quantified benefits

Quantified benefits for SaaS teams.

Sales velocity, audit velocity, and dependency-management velocity, measured against the status quo.

Metric
Before Safeguard
With Safeguard
Customer questionnaire turn-around
2 weeks
4 hours
SOC 2 evidence collection
6 weeks / audit
Continuous
PR review overhead (security)
~45 min
~5 min
Auto-fix on low-risk version bumps
~15%
~90%
Merge-frequency impact from gates
-20%
+0%
Alert volume per repo / month
~3,000
~150
Tools consolidated
4-5
1

Ship faster. Answer faster.

See the platform run against your repo. PR-time scans, live evidence store, customer SBOM portal — in one session.

Self-healing security runs on Safeguard.

Your first fix PR is minutes away.

No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.