How do I answer: do you have any known exploitable vulnerabilities?
A customer asks if you have known exploitable vulnerabilities. How to define the terms, answer truthfully with a date and evidence, and avoid overclaiming.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
A customer asks if you have known exploitable vulnerabilities. How to define the terms, answer truthfully with a date and evidence, and avoid overclaiming.
ASPM can supply records of scans, fixes and exceptions that support control evidence. It cannot make you compliant or replace an auditor. What it covers.
Know where an AI assistant stores the files it creates, who can open the link, how long it is kept and how an admin deletes it. A buyer checklist.
A practical evidence list for scheduled AI tasks: register, access reviews, run history, change records and test results, with how to store each.
Auditors ask whether every change was reviewed, tested, and approved. Here is the evidence to keep when an AI coding agent wrote part of the change.
NIST SP 800-218 lists code analysis, including static analysis tools, as a way to meet practice PW.7. It is a framework, so your organization decides when.
A new compliance tool shows many red tests on day one. Sort them by cause, risk and effort, fix quick high risk items first, and record each decision.
Legal sets the policy, engineering runs the scans and fixes, and someone owns the register. A simple split of duties for open source license compliance.
Which software fell under OMB M-22-18 as amended by M-23-16, and which did not: major versions, SaaS, open source, free products and contractors.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.