Better Ruby Gemfile security: a step-by-step guide
A step-by-step guide to auditing your Gemfile.lock, spotting RubyGems supply chain attacks, and locking down Ruby dependencies before they ship.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
A step-by-step guide to auditing your Gemfile.lock, spotting RubyGems supply chain attacks, and locking down Ruby dependencies before they ship.
Open source runs on unpaid maintainer labor. From xz-utils to Log4Shell to colors.js, we examine why burnout became a top supply chain security risk.
CycloneDX, SPDX, and SWID solve different problems. Here's how the SBOM formats differ, and how Safeguard's multi-format generation compares to Mend.io's approach.
The xz Utils backdoor started with a burned-out maintainer, not a zero-day. Here's why maintainer fatigue belongs in your supply chain risk model.
Corporations run on code that volunteers maintain for free. Here's a data-backed risk map—from left-pad to the xz-utils backdoor—and how to manage it.
Heartbleed, Log4Shell, and the 2024 xz backdoor all trace back to unpaid maintainers. Here's what it would actually cost companies to fund the dependencies they depend on.
xz-utils, event-stream, and ua-parser-js show how single-maintainer projects lack the security training and support that high-impact infrastructure now demands.
Most open source maintainers have no succession plan. That gap has already caused real incidents, from event-stream to XZ Utils, and it explains why.
GitHub Sponsors, Tidelift, and Open Collective pay maintainers in very different ways. Here's how their fees, payouts, and security guarantees actually compare.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.