Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
Ten concrete Docker image security practices — minimal base images, secret handling, reachability-based scanning, non-root runtimes, and SBOMs — with real CVEs and data.
CVE-2020-26137 let attackers inject CRLF sequences into urllib3-built HTTP requests. Here's the impact, affected versions, and how to remediate it.
SAST, DAST, and IAST each test different things. Here's how Checkmarx positions its platform, and where Safeguard's supply chain approach fits alongside it.
Choosing among DAST vendors hinges on how well the scanner authenticates, crawls modern apps and APIs, and fits into CI without turning into a manual chore.
Runc escapes, exposed Docker APIs, malicious registry images: the Docker vulnerabilities actually driving incidents in 2024-2025, and how to triage what's exploitable.
A DAST automated test probes your running application for vulnerabilities the way an attacker would, on every build. Here is how it works and the benefits of wiring it into CI.
False positives waste engineering time; false negatives cause breaches. A verifiable, metrics-based look at how Safeguard and Checkmarx approach scan accuracy.
A vulnerability assessment solution finds, ranks, and tracks weaknesses across your systems. Here is what separates a useful one from a report generator.
Base image choice drives most of your container's attack surface. Here's what secure Docker base images actually require, with concrete CVE data.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.
