Why SLSA Level 3 Matters (and Level 4 Usually Doesn't)
SLSA Level 3 gives you verifiable build provenance that satisfies CISA M-22-18 and EO 14028. Level 4 adds hermetic builds most teams will never need.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
SLSA Level 3 gives you verifiable build provenance that satisfies CISA M-22-18 and EO 14028. Level 4 adds hermetic builds most teams will never need.
Most XXE video walkthroughs stop at proof-of-concept file reads — here's what a genuinely useful one covers, plus the Java fix that actually closes the hole.
Chainguard ships minimal, signed Python images. Safeguard verifies and monitors whichever base image you run. Here's how the two approaches compare.
A senior engineer's breakdown of indirect prompt injection in RAG pipelines, how real attacks land through retrieved content, and what actually reduces exposure.
Forking looks like a one-time action but is really a multi-year maintenance commitment. Here is a decision framework for when a fork beats patching, vendoring, or replacing.
A use-after-free exploit turns a dangling pointer into arbitrary code execution — here's how the bug class works, why it still dominates browser and kernel CVEs, and how to catch it before release.
Code review and static analysis catch different bugs at different gates. Here's how they differ, where each fails, and how to combine them.
Chainguard's minimal Node.js images cut attack surface, but base-image choice is only one link in the chain. Here's how Safeguard compares on patching, debugging, and provenance.
An SBOM file is only useful if the tools reading it agree on its structure — here's what CycloneDX, SPDX, and SWID actually look like and when each one fits.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.