What does SLSA Source Level 4 two-party review require?
SLSA v1.2 Source L4 requires two trusted persons to review changes to protected branches. See what that means, what it does not prove, and how to prepare.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
SLSA v1.2 Source L4 requires two trusted persons to review changes to protected branches. See what that means, what it does not prove, and how to prepare.
SLSA Build L1 means a build produces provenance naming the output by digest. It is a modest start for inventory and debugging, but not tamper proof.
Neither is automatically safer. A decision guide for adopting single-maintainer or foundation-backed open source, with the controls each one needs.
The 2026 CISA minimum elements add an SBOM author signature. What it means, what a startup can honestly say today, and a sensible path to adding one.
Offering an SBOM early can shorten security reviews if you set terms, delivery and a cover note first. When to offer, how, and when to wait.
Notify customers when a change affects their risk: new release, corrected content, or a component with a serious issue. Skip noise from formatting changes.
Forking an action into your org freezes the code you reviewed, but adds upkeep. When it pays off, how to sync safely, and what a fork does not fix.
Committing the Pods folder makes builds independent of the network and review easier, but bloats the repo. Here is the trade-off and what to do either way.
Reachability changes how much review an AI fix deserves. Learn when to merge a low risk bump, when to defer, and what to record for unreachable code.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.