Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
CP-7 asks for an alternate processing site you can move to within a set time, with equipment and equivalent controls. What cloud teams show and where plans fall short.
CP-6 asks for a geographically distinct alternate storage site with agreements and equivalent controls. What counts for cloud teams and what evidence to keep.
CP-5 Contingency Plan Update was withdrawn in Rev 5 and folded into CP-2. Here is where its requirements went and what that means for your evidence.
CP-4 asks you to test the contingency plan, review the results and fix what fails. Test types, evidence to keep, common gaps and a schedule a small team can run.
CP-3 requires role based contingency training at onboarding, after system changes and on a schedule. What to deliver, the evidence to keep and the usual gaps.
CP-2 asks for a written contingency plan with recovery objectives, roles, review and protection. What the plan must hold, the evidence to keep and the gaps to avoid.
CP-13 asks for backup security mechanisms when the primary way of doing a security function fails or is compromised. What qualifies and how to document it.
CP-12 asks systems to enter a restricted safe mode when defined conditions are detected. A plain look at when it applies and how software teams can show it.
CP-11 asks for the ability to switch to other communications protocols to keep operating. What it means for most companies and how to document your answer.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.
