EU AI Act risk management (Article 9) step by step
Article 9 asks for a continuous, lifecycle risk management process for high-risk AI. Four steps, what to record and how to test against metrics.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
Article 9 asks for a continuous, lifecycle risk management process for high-risk AI. Four steps, what to record and how to test against metrics.
Article 17 asks providers of high-risk AI for a documented quality management system. The 13 elements, scaled to size, as a working checklist.
Article 12 requires high-risk AI to support automatic event logs, and Article 26 sets six-month retention for deployers. What to log and how to plan.
Article 14 asks for AI that people can really supervise: understand, interpret, override and stop it. How to design oversight that is more than a checkbox.
Article 99 sets fines up to 35 million or 7 percent, 15 million or 3 percent, and 7.5 million or 1 percent. How the tiers work and the SME rule.
A checklist of Article 26 duties for deployers of high-risk AI: instructions, oversight, input data, monitoring, logs, worker notice and incidents.
Article 6(3) lets some Annex III systems avoid high-risk status. The four conditions, the profiling limit and the paperwork the provider must keep.
Which EU AI Act obligations apply when, from February 2025 to August 2028, including the high-risk delays to December 2027 and August 2028 now.
Article 4 has applied since February 2025. It asks providers and deployers to support AI literacy for staff, not to guarantee a level. A practical plan.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.