Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
False positives waste engineering time; false negatives cause breaches. A verifiable, metrics-based look at how Safeguard and Checkmarx approach scan accuracy.
Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing solve different problems. Here's how Safeguard's supply chain approach compares to Checkmarx's AppSec platform.
AppSec teams drown in false positives. See how Safeguard's supply-chain-native triage compares to Checkmarx's SAST-driven approach on reachability, context, and workflow fit.
Shadow and zombie APIs caused breaches at Optus, T-Mobile, and Peloton. Here's why code-scanning tools miss them and what API security best practices actually work.
Leaked API keys still cause breaches within minutes. Here's how secrets detection and remediation should work in practice, and where scanner-only tools fall short.
SAST scans source code for flaws before deployment. Learn how it works, where Checkmarx-style tools fall short on supply chain risk, and how Safeguard closes the gap.
IAST tests applications from the inside while they run, catching flaws SAST and DAST miss alone. Here's how it works, how Checkmarx uses it, and where gaps remain.
Veracode built its name on SAST, DAST, and SCA for application code. Safeguard focuses static analysis on the software supply chain. Here's how the two actually differ.
What is application security? A concrete guide covering AppSec fundamentals, OWASP Top 10 risks, supply chain threats, and how Safeguard fills the gaps legacy tools like Veracode leave open.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.
