Safeguard
Compliance•

What must a vendor publish after a vulnerability is fixed?

What a software vendor should publish once a fix ships: description, affected products, impact, severity and remediation steps, per EU CRA Annex I.

Safeguard Security Team
4 min read

Once a security update exists, a vendor should publicly share a description of the vulnerability, information that lets users identify the affected product, its impact and severity, and clear steps to remediate. That list comes from Annex I, Part II of the EU Cyber Resilience Act, and it is a sound template even outside the EU.

Where the list comes from

Regulation (EU) 2024/2847, the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), sets vulnerability handling requirements in Annex I, Part II. Item 4 says that once a security update has been made available, manufacturers must share and publicly disclose information about fixed vulnerabilities. In duly justified cases, a manufacturer may delay publication until users have had the chance to apply the patch, if it judges the risk of publishing to outweigh the benefit.

Most of the regulation applies from 11 December 2027, so this is a preview of what is coming, not a deadline that has already passed. Check the regulation text and your own legal advice before relying on any summary, including this one.

The five things to publish

ElementWhat a reader needsWhere it often goes wrong
DescriptionWhat the flaw is, in plain wordsCopying a CVE title with no context
Affected productsProduct names and version rangesListing a library, not the product users run
ImpactWhat an attacker could doVague words like "may be at risk"
SeverityA score plus the vector it came fromA score with no source
RemediationThe fixed version and how to get itA fix with no upgrade path

Step by step

  1. Confirm the fixed release is available to users, not only built.
  2. Write the affected product list from your release records, using product names and versions customers recognise.
  3. State impact in one or two sentences an administrator can act on.
  4. Add severity, and say which scoring system and version you used.
  5. Give the remediation: fixed version, upgrade steps, and any workaround for those who cannot upgrade yet.
  6. Publish a human readable page and, if you can, a machine readable record alongside it.
  7. Link the advisory from your security contact page so people can find it.

Human readable and machine readable

A web page serves a person reading an alert. A machine readable record, such as a CSAF advisory or a VEX document, lets a customer's tooling match your statement to their inventory. The two should say the same thing. If they disagree, customers will trust neither.

Try it yourself

Click through it at your own pace, or open it full screen. Look at how a finding changes once a fixed version is known.

Quick check

Can a vendor delay publishing details after a fix?

Annex I, Part II allows it only in duly justified cases, where the security risks of publication outweigh the benefits, and only until users have had the chance to apply the patch.

Does this apply to products sold outside the EU?

The regulation covers products made available on the EU market. The publishing checklist is still a reasonable baseline for any vendor, but confirm scope with counsel.

Safeguard's SBOM and dependency scanning and compliance evidence automation can help a vendor keep the release records an advisory depends on. You can try a free scan of a project to see what an inventory looks like.

Sources

Last reviewed: 19 October 2026.

Never miss an update

Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.

Self-healing security runs on Safeguard.

Your first fix PR is minutes away.

No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.