A customer has your SOC 2 Type 2 report, but the period ended in June and it is now October. Their security team asks for a bridge letter. Linford and Company, a CPA firm, updated its SOC 2 explainer on 13 October 2026, and its separate guidance on bridge letters is clear on the basic point: management writes the letter, the auditor does not.
What's affected
Any company with a finished Type 2 report whose period has ended before the buyer's review date. The letter bridges the time between the end of your report period and the customer's own review date or year-end.
- Management signs it, on company letterhead. The CPA firm does not attest to the gap period, because no testing has happened since the period ended.
- According to Linford, the AICPA does not set bridge letter requirements, so the contents are a matter of practice.
- Most bridge letters cover no more than three months. A-LIGN says a letter "normally covers a period of three months" and suggests considering a new examination for longer gaps.
What to do now
- Check the buyer's contract or questionnaire for the maximum report age they accept. It controls the answer.
- Draft the letter with these parts, which both CPA firms list: the report period with exact dates, a statement of any material changes to the control environment (or that management knows of none), a reminder that the customer must still operate its complementary user entity controls, and a request to read the report. Add a line that the letter does not replace the report and may not be relied on by others.
- Date the letter on the day you sign it. The statements are made as of that date.
- Have someone who actually knows the environment confirm each statement before an officer signs. A false "no material changes" line is worse than no letter.
- If the gap is longer than about three months, talk to your auditor about the next period instead of writing a longer letter.
A minimal outline:
[Company letterhead]
Date: [date of signing]
Re: SOC 2 Type 2 report for the period [start] to [end]
Management confirms the following as of the date of this letter:
1. The report named above covers the period shown.
2. There have been no material changes to the system or controls
described in the report since [end], except: [list or "none"].
3. Management is not aware of any material deficiencies that would
change the service auditor's opinion.
4. This letter does not replace the SOC 2 report, is not a report
from the service auditor, and is for the named customer only.
Signed: [officer name and title]
How to avoid this trap
- Plan the next period before the current one ends. If the next window starts the day after the last one ends, the gap you have to explain stays short.
- Do not let a bridge letter turn into a standing document. Each one needs a fresh review of changes.
Quick check
Who signs a SOC 2 bridge letter?
Company management signs it. The CPA firm that issued the report does not sign or give assurance over the gap period.