Safeguard
Security Guides•

Phishing-resistant MFA rollout order for engineering teams

You cannot move every account to security keys at once. Here is a sensible order, from admins and email to source control, and what to do for the rest.

Safeguard Security Team
3 min read

Roll out phishing-resistant MFA in order of damage if the account is taken: administrators first, then email and identity, then source control and cloud consoles, then everyone else. CISA says any MFA is better than none, but phishing-resistant is the standard to aim for.

What counts as phishing-resistant

CISA's archived guidance calls FIDO and WebAuthn the only widely available phishing-resistant authentication, and says the protocol blocks the attempt when a user is tricked into logging in to a fake website. The Scattered Spider advisory adds PKI based MFA and says such methods resist push bombing and SIM swaps. SMS, one-time codes and push approvals are better than nothing but can be relayed or socially engineered.

Step 1: administrators

Cloud, identity and registry admins. One takeover here unlocks everything. Issue two keys each, one spare stored safely. Remove SMS and push as fallbacks for these accounts, otherwise an attacker simply picks the weaker route. Microsoft recommends requiring phishing-resistant MFA for admins.

Step 2: email and identity provider

Mailboxes are where resets land and where payment fraud is staged. See what business email compromise means for engineers. Protect the identity provider itself, since it gates everything else.

Step 3: source control, CI and package registries

Repository owners, release managers and anyone who can publish. The damage here travels downstream. See npm maintainer account security.

Step 4: production and cloud consoles

Break glass accounts, database admins and anyone with production access.

Step 5: everyone else

Passkeys on managed devices cover most staff. Decide the recovery path early, because recovery is the usual weak point. See passkey recovery design.

Interim steps while you roll out

CISA's archived guidance says that if phishing-resistant MFA is not possible yet, consider number matching to help block push bombardment. See MFA fatigue and number matching. Also add conditional access so a stolen session meets more checks.

Common snags

  • Shared accounts, which cannot hold a personal key. Remove sharing first.
  • Legacy apps that only accept passwords. List them and set an end date.
  • Help desk resets that skip the key. See help desk controls.
  • Contractors on personal devices. Decide whether a managed key is issued.

Measure progress

Track the share of each tier enrolled with a phishing-resistant method, the number of accounts that still allow SMS or push as a fallback, and the number of resets handled by the help desk each month. A dashboard with three numbers is enough. Review it monthly with the owner of each tier, and set a date for turning off the weaker fallback once enrolment passes a threshold you choose. Without the date, the weak path stays open indefinitely.

Quick check

Should we wait until everyone can move?

No. Start with the highest risk accounts, since those are the ones attackers want most.

Is TOTP acceptable in the meantime?

It is better than no MFA, and CISA says any MFA beats none, but it can be relayed by a proxy phishing page. Plan to replace it.

Sources

Last reviewed: 19 October 2026.

Never miss an update

Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.

Self-healing security runs on Safeguard.

Your first fix PR is minutes away.

No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.