Yes. A credible SBOM story depends on being specific and true, not on team size. One person can automate SBOM generation in CI, keep a short process note, name a backup, and be open about gaps. Reviewers trust a small, working process over a large, vague one.
What reviewers are checking
When a startup says "I am the security team," the reviewer is not looking for headcount. They are looking for signs the process does not depend on one person's memory. Three things carry weight: it is automated, it is written down, and someone else could run it.
What to automate first
A solo owner should spend scarce time on the pieces that fail silently when ignored.
- Generation in CI. An SBOM produced on every release needs no reminder. CISA's 2026 minimum elements guidance asks that each software version or update has an associated SBOM, so tie generation to the release step.
- Storage. Save each SBOM next to the release record so you can find the one for any version a customer runs.
- Alerting. A scheduled rescan against new advisories means you learn about a problem from your tooling, not from a customer email.
Everything else can be manual at first: sending files to buyers, writing the cover note, answering follow ups.
What to write down
One page is enough. Include the tool name, the CI job that runs it, the file format, where output lives, who owns it, and the steps for a new advisory. The NIST Secure Software Development Framework describes practices like these as part of producing secure software, with a focus on outcomes that different organizations can meet in their own way (see Sources). Your page is your version of that for the SBOM piece.
Name a backup
Even in a tiny company, name a second person who knows where the SBOMs live and can send one. It can be the CTO or a senior developer. Write their name in the process note. This single line answers the "what if you are on vacation" question before it is asked.
What to admit
Honest gaps are a strength when stated plainly. Examples a solo owner might truthfully say:
- "We cover our two production services. Internal tools are not yet included."
- "We do not sign SBOMs yet."
- "VEX statements are produced on request, not published."
The 2026 guidance asks SBOM authors to say explicitly when data is unknown or withheld. The same habit applies to your process: say what is not yet done.
What to say on the call
"I own this, and I have automated the SBOM step in CI so it does not depend on my calendar. Our CTO is the backup. Here is the process note and a sample. These are the three things we have not done yet."
Short, specific and checkable.
Where Safeguard fits
For a small team, Safeguard can handle SBOM and dependency scanning and compliance evidence collection, with policies and gates to enforce rules in the pull request flow. The free scan lets you test it on one repository first.
Try it yourself
Click through it at your own pace, or open it full screen.
Look at how a rescan surfaces new findings without anyone running a manual check.
Quick check
Is it risky to admit gaps to a buyer?
Usually less risky than being caught overstating. State gaps factually and pair each with a plan only if you will keep it.
What if I cannot automate everything yet?
Automate generation and storage first, and write the rest down. A documented manual step is better than an undocumented one.
Sources
- 2026 Minimum Elements for a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM), CISA
- SP 800-218, Secure Software Development Framework (SSDF) Version 1.1, NIST
Last reviewed: 19 October 2026.