What AI Executive Orders Actually Mean for Enterprise Security Teams
The US revoked its AI safety EO in January 2025, but SBOM and evidence obligations under EO 14028 never went away — and the EU AI Act just got harder deadlines.
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
The US revoked its AI safety EO in January 2025, but SBOM and evidence obligations under EO 14028 never went away — and the EU AI Act just got harder deadlines.
Developers using AI coding assistants wrote less secure code in 4 of 5 tasks in a 2023 Stanford study — and were more confident it was safe.
A 2021 NYU study found roughly 40% of Copilot completions on security-relevant prompts contained exploitable flaws. Here's a field guide to catching them.
One 2025 benchmark found an LLM filter cut Semgrep's false positives by 88.6% — while a separate study found GPT-4 alone flagging vulnerabilities was wrong more often than right.
GitHub says Copilot Autofix resolves two-thirds of flagged vulnerabilities with little editing; Snyk claims 80% fix accuracy. Here's the pipeline behind both numbers.
OWASP's 2025 LLM Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS both treat adversarial testing and posture scanning as separate disciplines — most AI programs still run only one.
NYU found 40% of Copilot-generated code contained exploitable flaws; Samsung banned ChatGPT after three leaks in under 20 days. The productivity math still isn't simple.
NIST's NICE Framework sorts cybersecurity work into 7 categories and 52 work roles — most security teams have never mapped a single job description to it.
Gartner coined the ASPM term in May 2023 and projects over 40% of organizations building software will adopt it by 2026 — here is what it actually does.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.