vulnerability-management
Safeguard articles tagged "vulnerability-management" — guides, analysis, and best practices for software supply chain and application security.
689 articles
PCI DSS requirements for application security programs
PCI DSS v4.0.1 Requirement 6 sets hard deadlines and evidence rules for AppSec — here's what 6.2.3, 6.3.1–6.3.3 actually demand.
FedRAMP authorization for cloud service providers explained
A concrete walkthrough of FedRAMP authorization for CSPs: impact levels, control counts, timelines, costs, FedRAMP 20x, and continuous monitoring deadlines.
Socket.dev vs Snyk: SCA feature comparison
Socket.dev flags risky OSS packages; Snyk scans for known CVEs. See how Safeguard unifies both approaches into one supply chain security workflow.
Socket.dev vs Dependabot: beyond automated dependency upd...
Dependabot patches known CVEs; Socket.dev flags risky package behavior. Neither enforces policy or ties risk to your actual build and runtime footprint — here's where Safeguard fits.
Socket.dev alternatives for enterprise supply chain security
Comparing Safeguard and Socket.dev on detection philosophy, ecosystem coverage, and supply chain breadth for enterprise security teams evaluating alternatives.
EU Cyber Resilience Act: what developers need to know
The EU Cyber Resilience Act sets hard deadlines starting Sept 2026 for SBOMs, vulnerability reporting, and patching. Here's what developers must build.
Safeguard Griffin AI: Autonomous Vulnerability Remediation That Actually Works
Griffin AI moves beyond scan-and-alert to autonomously generate, test, and propose vulnerability fixes. How Safeguard's remediation engine reduces mean time to fix without introducing new risk.
NIS2 Directive compliance for software vendors
NIS2 became enforceable October 17, 2024, and Article 21 now requires software vendors to prove SBOM, CVE remediation, and disclosure practices to EU customers.
CISA's Secure by Design pledge explained
CISA's voluntary Secure by Design pledge has grown from 68 signatories to 300+, but it's unverified and self-reported. Here's what the seven goals really require.
5 risks of using open source software
Five documented open source risks — from Log4Shell to the XZ Utils backdoor — with real incidents, dates, and CVEs, plus how Safeguard closes the gap.
Building an SBOM that meets NTIA minimum elements
A field-by-field breakdown of NTIA's SBOM minimum elements, who's legally required to meet them in 2026, and why conformant fields don't guarantee real dependency coverage.
SPDX vs CycloneDX: comparing SBOM formats
SPDX and CycloneDX both satisfy federal SBOM rules, but they solve different problems. Here's how they actually differ — with real specs, dates, and tooling.
Self-healing security runs on Safeguard.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.