Safeguard
Tag

mythos

Safeguard articles tagged "mythos" — guides, analysis, and best practices for software supply chain and application security.

100 articles

AI Security

Cache Hit Optimisation: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Prompt caching and engine memoisation combine to make Griffin AI scans repeat-cheap. Pure-LLM tools recompute the same reasoning on every run.

Jan 27, 20266 min read
AI Security

CWE Classification Accuracy: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Getting the CWE right is not a taxonomic hobby. It drives remediation, compliance mapping, and detection engineering. Here is how grounded and pure-LLM scanners compare.

Jan 26, 20266 min read
AI Security

Data Residency Controls: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Data residency is no longer a procurement checkbox. It is an architectural property that most pure-LLM vendors cannot deliver without major rework.

Jan 25, 20267 min read
AI Security

Regression Testing on Fixes: Griffin AI vs Mythos

A remediation PR is only useful if it does not break anything else. Griffin AI runs targeted regression before opening; Mythos-class tools usually do not.

Jan 24, 20266 min read
AI Security

SPDX Coverage: Griffin AI vs Mythos

SPDX is the format auditors ask for, the format regulators reference, and the format most enterprise procurement teams standardize on. Griffin AI treats it as a first-class graph. Mythos-class tools treat it as a long document.

Jan 23, 20267 min read
AI Security

FedRAMP HIGH Posture: Griffin AI vs Mythos

FedRAMP HIGH demands 421 controls with documented, continuous evidence. Griffin AI produces control-mapped records every day. Mythos-class pure-LLM tools cannot fill a 3PAO evidence package.

Jan 22, 20266 min read
AI Security

Taint Propagation: Griffin AI vs Mythos Approaches

Taint tells you whether attacker data actually reaches a sink. Griffin AI propagates it; Mythos-class tools infer it. The difference shows up fast.

Jan 22, 20266 min read
AI Security

Adversarial Resistance: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Griffin AI reports 98-100% hold rate against adversarial probes. Most Mythos-class tools have never published an adversarial number at all.

Jan 21, 20267 min read
AI Security

Deserialization Vulnerabilities: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Unsafe deserialization looks obvious on a slide and impossible on a real codebase. Sinks are language-specific, gadgets live in third-party libraries, and the tainted byte can arrive wrapped in six layers of framework ceremony. Griffin's engine-plus-LLM design handles each of those concerns separately; Mythos-style pure-LLM scanners blur them into pattern-matching.

Jan 20, 20267 min read
AI Security

The Disproof Step: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Most AI bug hunters skip the hardest step: trying to kill their own findings. Here is why Griffin AI's disproof pass is the single biggest lever on false-positive rate.

Jan 19, 20265 min read
AI Security

Model Tiering Strategy: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Opus for reasoning, Sonnet for drafting, Haiku for scale. We break down when each tier earns its keep and why single-model architectures cannot compete.

Jan 19, 20266 min read
AI Security

SSO & SCIM: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Enterprise identity is not a paywall. It is the substrate on which every other security control depends, and it is where Mythos-class vendors quietly fall behind.

Jan 18, 20267 min read

Self-healing security runs on Safeguard.

Your first fix PR is minutes away.

No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.