ai-agents
Safeguard articles tagged "ai-agents" — guides, analysis, and best practices for software supply chain and application security.
69 articles
Model Context Protocol in 2026: News, Adoption, and Security Landscape
The latest Model Context Protocol news: foundation governance, near-universal vendor adoption, a maturing spec, and a security track record that already includes critical CVEs.
Agentic Commerce: Why Your SaaS Has to Let AI Agents Buy
AI agents already research, compare, and recommend software — but the moment they hit a paywall, they stall and hand the job back to a human. Here's why that gap is expensive, and how agent-native purchasing closes it.
AI agents in AppSec pipelines: triage, remediation, and guardrails
GitHub's Copilot Autofix cuts median fix time from 1.5 hours to 28 minutes — but a 2025 Replit agent incident shows why autonomy needs hard limits.
Least-Privilege Tool Scoping for AI Coding Agents
One overprivileged GitHub token let researchers hijack an AI agent into leaking private repo data via a public issue. Scoping tool access closes that gap.
AI Agents and Supply Chain Security FAQ: 2026 Answers
Answers on where AI agents meet software supply chain security — the dependencies agents pull in, hallucinated packages, MCP servers as components, AIBOMs, and how Safeguard keeps the agentic supply chain governed.
What Is the Model Context Protocol (MCP)? And What It Means for Security
MCP is the USB-C of AI integrations — one open standard for connecting models to tools and data. It also standardizes a fresh attack surface, so understanding both halves matters.
Agents Can Now Procure Safeguard Through MCP
AI agents can browse regional pricing, compare tiers, start a Stripe checkout, and verify activation — the entire Safeguard procurement journey now runs through the MCP server.
Guardrails for Autonomous AI Agents: Allowlisting, Validation, and Human-in-the-Loop
OWASP's 2025 LLM Top 10 splits Excessive Agency into three root causes. Here's how tool allowlisting, output validation, and approval gates address each one.
How Malicious Skills Get Distributed Through Agent Registries
CVE-2025-59536 (CVSS 8.7) let a single malicious commit auto-approve MCP servers in Claude Code, no install click required. Registries need the same controls as package managers.
Prompt injection via AI agent CI/CD workflow tampering
A single malicious PR title was enough to make three major AI coding agents leak API keys straight out of a GitHub Actions runner.
Governing AI agents inside the execution loop
Snyk's Evo Agentic Development Security, in open preview since June 23, 2026, hooks directly into an agent's tool calls — proof that pre-deployment review can't govern a decision made mid-session.
New security risks across the agentic development lifecycle
Snyk found 76 confirmed-malicious skills among 3,984 analyzed and roughly a third of public MCP servers carrying exploitable flaws — legacy AppSec never modeled an agent as the author.
Self-healing security runs on Safeguard.
Your first fix PR is minutes away.
No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.