Safeguard
Vulnerability Analysis•

CVE-2025-6957: High SQL Injection in Campcodes EMS

CVE-2025-6957: High (7.3) SQL injection in Campcodes EMS 1.0 via mailuid. No fixed version is listed, so patch the query, limit access or retire it.

Safeguard Security Team
5 min read

CVE-2025-6957 is a high severity (7.3) SQL injection in Campcodes Employee Management System 1.0. The mailuid argument handled by /process/eprocess.php reaches a database query unsafely. The record lists no fixed version, so limit access, repair the query with a prepared statement, or retire the application.

What's affected

  • Product: Campcodes Employee Management System, version 1.0 (the only version named in the record).
  • Component: /process/eprocess.php, which is a process script in the employee area.
  • Parameter: mailuid.
  • Fixed version: none is listed in the record or in the sources we could reach. Check the vendor site for a newer release before assuming one exists.

The NVD record scores this 7.3 (High, vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L). The description, which comes from VulDB, calls the issue "critical". Both statements are in the record, so treat the CVSS score as the formal rating and the word "critical" as VulDB's own wording.

The record sets no KEV flag, and none of the pages we fetched say the issue is exploited against real systems. It does say a public disclosure exists, and that is enough reason to treat the flaw as known to attackers.

How to check if you're exposed

This is a self-hosted PHP application, not a package from a registry, so there is no package manager command that answers the question. Work through these checks instead.

  1. Find out whether you run it. Search your web roots and deployment inventory for the product name and for the file /process/eprocess.php.
  2. Confirm the version. The record only names 1.0, so if you cannot tell which release you have, assume you are affected.
  3. Look at how the file builds its query. In the source, search for places where mailuid or the matching request variable is joined into a SQL string. A grep such as the one below shows candidates.
grep -rn "mysqli_query\|mysql_query\|->query(" /var/www/html | grep -i "\$_\(GET\|POST\|REQUEST\|COOKIE\)"
  1. Review web server and database logs for unusual values sent to /process/eprocess.php, such as stray quotes, SQL keywords or very long inputs. Repeated errors from the database layer are a warning sign.
  2. Check whether the application is reachable from the internet. The record describes a remote attack with no privileges and no user interaction, so internet exposure is what raises the urgency.

What to do now

  1. Take the application off the public internet, or place it behind a VPN or an IP allow list, until it is fixed.
  2. Replace the vulnerable query with a prepared statement. In PHP with mysqli the pattern looks like this.
$stmt = $mysqli->prepare("SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ?");
$stmt->bind_param("s", $email);
$stmt->execute();
  1. Run the application's database account with the fewest rights it needs. It should not own the schema or have file or administrative privileges.
  2. Add a web application firewall rule or request validation in front of /process/eprocess.php as a stopgap, and do not count it as a fix.
  3. Check the vendor site for a patched release. If none exists, plan to replace the application and review the rest of its pages for the same pattern.
  4. Rotate any credentials stored in the database if logs suggest someone probed the endpoint.

Why it matters

This is injection in the classic sense. The code takes a value from the request and uses it inside a query without separating data from command. The record tags it CWE-74 and CWE-89 for that reason.

The class is tracked as CWE-89 (SQL injection) under the broader CWE-74 (injection). The flaw sits in a process script in the employee area, so the data behind it is what is at risk: records in the Employee Management System database, and possibly stored credentials. The vector in the record rates confidentiality, integrity and availability each as low impact, which is why the score stops at 7.3. Real impact depends on what the database account can reach.

The pattern repeats across small PHP applications. When one page builds queries by string concatenation, others usually do too, and public disclosures tend to arrive in groups. Fixing one parameter and leaving the rest leaves the same exposure in place.

Quick check

Is there a patch for CVE-2025-6957?

The record lists no fixed version. Check the vendor site and the advisory yourself. Until a release exists, restrict access and fix the query in your own copy.

Can I find this in my own stack without a package manager?

Yes, but it takes code review. Search for the file /process/eprocess.php and for any query that includes request values without binding. A static scan of your own source can speed this up, and the free in-browser dependency scan at gold.safeguard.sh/scan covers the libraries your projects pull in alongside it.

Sources

The researcher issue linked from the record could not be retrieved when we checked on 18 October 2026, and VulDB blocks automated access, so the details above come from the NVD record.

Last reviewed: 18 October 2026.

Never miss an update

Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.

Self-healing security runs on Safeguard.

Your first fix PR is minutes away.

No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.