AI Security
In-depth guides and analysis on ai security from the Safeguard engineering team.
676 articles
Griffin AI vs xAI Grok for Security
Enterprise AI Security Rollout: The Governance Gap
Most enterprises rolled out AI-for-security tools faster than their governance processes could keep up. The resulting gap is where most of the pain from 2025 deployments lives.
Griffin AI vs Llama 3 for Security Workflows
Llama 3 is a powerful open-weight foundation model, but security workflows demand more than raw inference. Here is how Griffin AI compares.
Remediation PR Quality: Griffin AI vs Mythos
Griffin AI produces draft PRs with taint paths, exploit hypotheses, and disproof attempts. Mythos-class pure-LLM tools skip those anchors, and PR quality suffers.
CyberSecEval Reviewed: What It Measures
A working engineer's review of CyberSecEval, the Meta-originated benchmark that has quietly become the default sniff test for AI-for-security claims. What it actually measures, what it misses, and how to read its scores without fooling yourself.
SSDF Attestation: Griffin AI vs Mythos
The NIST SSDF attestation form asks structured questions with structured answers. A chat transcript is not an answer. We explain how Griffin AI produces the evidence auditors expect, and why Mythos-class tools struggle.
Griffin AI vs Raw Claude for Security Workflow
Griffin AI runs on Anthropic's Claude models under the hood. Here's what the engine context, eval harness, and workflow scaffolding actually buy you over calling Claude directly.
AI Agent Tool-Scope Enforcement Patterns
Agents get tool lists, not tool boundaries. We walk through scoping patterns that actually hold when Claude 4 or GPT-5 picks the wrong function at runtime.
Griffin AI vs Pure GPT-5 for Security Workflows
Frontier models are remarkable reasoners, but security workflows demand more than raw intelligence. Here's how Griffin AI grounds frontier reasoning in real tenant context.
Reachability Analysis: Griffin AI vs Mythos
Reachability-grounded reasoning produces actionable findings. Ungrounded LLM reasoning produces speculation. We explain the methodology gap.
Specialised Security LLM vs Frontier Model: The Choice
Frontier models are general polymaths. Security-specific LLMs are narrow experts. Choosing between them is rarely about raw intelligence and almost always about cost, latency, and the shape of your data.
Frontier Model Non-Determinism As A Security Limit
Non-determinism is not a rough edge frontier labs will polish away. It is an architectural property of how transformer decoding works, and it places a hard ceiling on the kinds of security contracts you can sign.