Safeguard
Topic

AI Security

In-depth guides and analysis on ai security from the Safeguard engineering team.

676 articles

AI Security

Griffin AI vs Gemini Ultra for Security Reasoning

Gemini Ultra sets a high bar on complex reasoning benchmarks. But security reasoning is not benchmark reasoning. Here's how Griffin AI's engine-first approach changes the outcome.

Jan 15, 20267 min read
AI Security

CycloneDX Support: Griffin AI vs Mythos

CycloneDX is not a text format to be summarized — it's a typed graph with dozens of semantically-rich fields. Griffin AI consumes it as a graph. Mythos-class tools consume it as tokens. That difference decides every downstream finding.

Jan 15, 20267 min read
AI Security

Training Data Provenance: The Regulatory Wave

Regulators across three continents are converging on a single demand: show where your training data came from. The engineering implications are larger than most labs have admitted.

Jan 14, 20266 min read
AI Security

Call Graph Depth Compared: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Shallow call graphs miss real exploits; deep graphs surface them. We examine how Griffin AI and Mythos-class tools differ on depth, and why it matters.

Jan 14, 20266 min read
AI Security

Enforcing container compliance with Azure Policy

How Azure Policy enforces container compliance on AKS—registry restriction, regulatory mapping, and where admission-time policy alone falls short.

Jan 14, 20268 min read
AI Security

Eval Methodology: Griffin AI vs Mythos

A benchmark number is only as good as the methodology that produced it. Here is how Griffin AI builds its harness and why most Mythos-class tools cannot be audited.

Jan 13, 20267 min read
AI Security

SQL Injection Chains: Griffin AI vs Mythos

SQL injection stopped being a single-line bug years ago. Modern chains stitch a tainted parameter through ORMs, caches, background jobs, and downstream services. Griffin AI's engine-plus-LLM architecture follows the taint across those hops; Mythos-class pure-LLM scanners summarise one file at a time and lose the thread.

Jan 13, 20267 min read
AI Security

Hypothesis Quality: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Two AI bug hunters can both generate hypotheses. Only one can defend them. A field study of grounded versus ungrounded hypothesis generation in zero-day discovery.

Jan 12, 20266 min read
AI Security

Vulnerability Scanning for AI Models: A New Frontier

AI models ship with dependencies, use vulnerable libraries, and introduce novel attack surfaces. Traditional scanning is not enough.

Jan 12, 20266 min read
AI Security

Securing Claude Code MCP Server Deployments

Claude Code MCP servers run with the privileges of the developer who invoked them. That makes deployment posture the entire security model.

Jan 12, 20267 min read
AI Security

Air-Gapped Environments: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Air-gapped AI is not a feature flag. It is an architectural commitment, and it separates serious enterprise products from consumer-grade assistants.

Jan 11, 20267 min read
AI Security

Per-Scan Token Cost: Griffin AI vs Mythos

Tiered models and a deterministic engine cut token consumption to the moments that need reasoning. Pure-LLM tools pay full price for every trivial check.

Jan 11, 20266 min read
AI Security (Page 43) — Supply Chain Security Blog | Safeguard