Vendor risk that's live, not annual.
Ingest supplier SBOMs, run AI-vendor diligence, automate questionnaires, and watch your supplier graph continuously — instead of chasing attestations once a year and hoping nothing changed.
What your week looks like today.
Vendor security questionnaires take two weeks per vendor and you have 80 of them.
Half your supplier list hasn't produced an SBOM and the regulator wants one.
A new supplier ships an AI feature — nobody knows what models or datasets it uses.
Your 'continuous monitoring' is an annual attestation form everyone fills in identically.
A supplier just got breached; you spend four days mapping which products they're in.
M&A diligence on a software target needs eight weeks and three external firms.
Benefits, by use case.
Line by line — what each use case does for your specific role.
What you'll actually use.
AI-native and traditional, in the rhythm of your week.
- Griffin AIReasons over the supplier graph — surfaces risk that humans miss.
- AI-BOMDefensible answer to 'what AI is the vendor shipping.'
- Compliance Reporting AIDrafts due-diligence narratives from supplier evidence.
- Auto-FixFor internal use of supplier-vulnerable packages.
- Griffin AI for diligenceM&A diligence in 5 days under NDA.
- TPRMThird-party risk continuously monitored, not annually attested.
- SBOM StudioSupplier SBOM ingest in any format, normalized into one graph.
- Compliance ReportingFramework-mapped supplier evidence packs.
- Vendor Questionnaire AutomationAuto-fill from continuous evidence.
- Threat FeedSupplier breach IOCs streamed in real time.
Where this Persona fits.
The Customer Personas where this role gets the most from Safeguard.