Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
Security questionnaires have ballooned into 400-row spreadsheets that nobody reads carefully. Here is how to replace the ritual with evidence ingestion that actually changes vendor risk decisions.
Annual vendor reviews discover problems eleven months too late. Continuous monitoring closes the gap, but only if your TPRM tooling can ingest and normalize signals at vendor scale.
Most vendor incidents go badly because the first 72 hours are spent figuring out who to call. A pre-built coordination playbook turns chaos into a rehearsed response.
The Okta customer support breach of October 2023 exposed HAR files containing session tokens for major customers. The structural lessons run deeper than the incident.
Most TPRM programs tier vendors by spend. That misses the vendors who are cheap but catastrophic when they fail. Tiering by blast radius is the fix.
CMMC 2.0 and the EU Cyber Resilience Act both require obligations to flow down through your supply chain. Here is how to write the clauses and verify the compliance.
Safeguard's new TPRM module replaces vendor questionnaires with SBOM-driven, continuous third-party risk assessment.
A SOC 2 report does not mean the vendor is secure. Here is how to read attestations carefully, what FedRAMP actually proves, and how to ingest both at scale.
A senior engineer's view of DORA third-party ICT risk in 2026: register of information, concentration risk, subcontractor depth, and the operational controls regulators actually test.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.