Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
How Socket.dev and Phylum compare on behavioral detection, ecosystem coverage, scoring transparency, and the developer ergonomics that decide adoption.
A walkthrough of generating SBOMs with Tern in 2026, covering layer-by-layer inspection, CycloneDX output, and practical comparison with Syft.
How open source funding flows connect to security outcomes in 2026: maintainer capacity, critical project support, and the patterns that reduce risk.
Comparing the major open source vulnerability databases in 2026: NVD, OSV, GHSA, GitLab Advisory, and ecosystem-specific feeds measured on coverage and freshness.
Fintechs ship fast and run on a thick layer of open source. Here is what the 2026 supply chain threat landscape looks like for a modern payments or lending platform, and the controls that actually scale.
A senior engineer's view of six years of npm protestware, from colors.js to peacenotwar, and the supply chain lessons that still apply to modern JavaScript shops.
Practical patterns for using the OSV.dev API in production: batch queries, schema gotchas, version range parsing, and how to integrate OSV data into your own vulnerability pipelines.
Forking was once a last resort. In 2024 it became a standard response to license changes, governance failures, and stalled projects. A good forking strategy is now an enterprise competency.
The Linux Foundation, Apache Software Foundation, CNCF, and Eclipse each codify different theories of how open source projects should be governed. The differences matter more than most adopters realize.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.