AI Security
Griffin AI vs Gemini Function Calling: Security
Gemini's function calling is strong and flexible. Griffin AI's tool layer is narrow and opinionated. For security workflows, the opinionated approach wins.
Feb 8, 20268 min read
Deep dives, practical guides, and incident analyses from engineers who build Safeguard. No fluff, no vendor FUD — just what you need to ship secure software.
Gemini's function calling is strong and flexible. Griffin AI's tool layer is narrow and opinionated. For security workflows, the opinionated approach wins.
Gemini's million-token context window is a genuinely new capability. For security analysis of large codebases, is it enough on its own?
Gemini Code Assist makes developers faster. But faster is not safer. Here's how Griffin AI layers a security engine onto the same developer workflow.
Gemini Ultra sets a high bar on complex reasoning benchmarks. But security reasoning is not benchmark reasoning. Here's how Griffin AI's engine-first approach changes the outcome.
Gemini Pro brings capable reasoning and a massive context window to general-purpose workflows. Griffin AI brings a security engine with an LLM on top. The difference matters when the workflow is appsec.
An inside look at Google's multi-layered approach to supply chain security, from Binary Authorization to SLSA, and what other organizations can adapt from their model.
Google's SLSA framework provides a graduated model for supply chain integrity, from basic provenance to fully verified builds. Here's how it works and why it matters.
Weekly insights on software supply chain security, delivered to your inbox.