The platform turns the recurring customer-questionnaire grind into a live evidence query. Controls map to your real tenant data — SBOMs, scan results, policy decisions — not to a spreadsheet that goes stale the moment it's saved.
Every enterprise deal asks the same 200 questions in slightly different layouts. Most security teams maintain a master spreadsheet, copy answers across, then sweat the questions where the answer has changed since last quarter.
The real cost is not the typing — it's the staleness risk. An answer that was true at signing becomes a misrepresentation at renewal if the underlying control changed and nobody updated the canned text.
The platform inverts the workflow. Controls are derived from live tenant data. The LLM drafts the answer, grounded in that data, with the supporting evidence attached inline. The reviewer ratifies; nothing gets sent without a human signature, but the human is reviewing — not typing.
The master answer doc was current six months ago. Today, half the answers reference deprecated tooling and the other half are subtly wrong. Nobody knows which half is which.
SOC 2 CC6.1 maps to ISO A.12.4 maps to DPDP Sec. 8 — every team rebuilds the cross-walk per questionnaire because no live map exists.
The control text says "continuous vulnerability scanning". The evidence sits in three dashboards. Pulling proof for a single answer is its own afternoon project.
The 10 unusual questions per questionnaire — encryption-key rotation cadence, regional data residency, model-training data sources — pull engineers into review threads daily.
Every artefact — SBOMs, scan results, policy decisions, audit logs, control narratives — lives in a queryable per-tenant store with cryptographic timestamps.
SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST 800-53, PCI-DSS, DPDP, GDPR maintained as versioned mapping files; updates propagate to every in-flight questionnaire automatically.
Each question routes to the Griffin family which retrieves matching evidence and drafts the response with the source artefacts cited inline. No hallucinated controls.
Completed questionnaires export as PDF + signed JSON evidence bundle; revision history is preserved per question for audit and renewal cycles.
Upload the questionnaire (xlsx / csv / web-form export); the platform extracts every question and clusters by framework family.
Each question matched to internal controls via the versioned cross-walk; ambiguous matches surfaced for human disambiguation.
For each control, the tenant evidence store returns the most recent supporting artefacts with timestamps and provenance.
Griffin composes the answer grounded strictly in retrieved evidence; citations appear inline. Unsupported answers return as "needs human input".
Security reviewer ratifies, edits, or flags; edits feed back into the canonical control narrative for future re-use.
Completed questionnaire exports as the customer-requested format plus a signed JSON evidence bundle and a per-question audit log.
Sources include SBOM Studio for artefacts, scanner-suite for scan results, and comply-with-global-regulations for framework cross-walks.
Upload one of your recent questionnaires; we'll return the auto-drafted answer set with live evidence citations.