Safeguard
Solution · Naval & Submarine

Naval & Submarine. Sovereign software supply chain integrity for the hull, the combat system, and the SCIF.

Navies, submarine fleets, and naval shipbuilders run on combat-management systems, sonar, periscope optics, and classified comms supplied by dozens of primes and sub-tier vendors. STANAG accreditation, IL5+ classified networks, and cyber-physical safety turn every embedded dependency into an audit obligation. Safeguard delivers live attestation, on the platform, without an egress path.

◈ the standing query — evidence answers on demand, not once a year
STANAG
Aligned
IL5+
Classified Network Ready
IEC 62443
Control Library
0
Egress In Air-Gapped Mode
Industry pressures

Four forces converging on the combat-system pipeline.

Allied policy, classified-network rules, and cyber-physical safety are collapsing into one continuous evidence requirement at the hull.

NATO STANAG cyber rules

Allied navies and primes must align combat-system software to STANAG 4774, AC/322 directives, and per-nation classified-network policy. Annual paperwork no longer satisfies a NATO accreditation officer who wants live attestation across every embedded component on the hull.

IL5+ classified-network handling

Combat-management traffic, sonar telemetry, and weapons-cueing pipelines run on enclaves at Secret or above. A platform that cannot operate offline, with customer-controlled keys and no upstream telemetry, cannot be deployed inside the SCIF.

Cyber-physical safety of combat systems

A CVE in a sonar signal-processing library is not a ticket — it is a kinetic safety event. Reachability and exploit prioritisation must extend through firmware and FPGA toolchains, not stop at the IT boundary.

Submarine acoustic-signature integrity

Acoustic libraries, machinery-noise baselines, and silencing models are crown-jewel data. A maintainer takeover in a numerical-DSP package, or a tampered ML model, can silently degrade signature management without any operator-visible failure.

How Safeguard fits

Capability mapped to classified-mission expectation.

Sovereign Griffin Zero on-platform inference

Combat-AI inference runs on the hull, on customer hardware, with no internet egress. Weights are SHA-pinned and attested at install, and the entire control plane lives inside the platform's classified enclave.

Signed firmware SBOM per system

Every combat-management, sonar, periscope-optics, and comms LRU emits a CycloneDX SBOM with signed provenance pinned to the firmware SHA. STANAG audit becomes a query against the trust packet, not a six-month evidence hunt.

Air-gapped offline database sync

Vulnerability, KEV, and component intelligence flow into the platform via approved one-way conduits. Delta-only updates keep the on-board database current without ever opening an egress path from the classified side.

PSIRT for classified disclosures

Disclosure workflows respect classification boundaries by default. Advisories route through cleared channels, with cryptographically separated streams for unclassified, restricted, and Secret-grade content — and SLA timers that survive air-gapped operation.

Compliance alignment

Frameworks the platform is mapped to.

Pre-mapped control narratives and evidence in the formats your accreditation officer already accepts.

NATO AC/322 + STANAG 4774
US DoDI 5200.48
UK JSP-440
Per-nation classified handling
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
IEC 62443
NIST SP 800-171
ITAR / EAR
Reference architecture

A typical deployment on a classified hull.

Sovereign Griffin Zero on the platform, air-gapped delta sync via approved conduits, ITAR-aware audit log, and a supplier trust packet ready for prime submission.

  1. 01

    On-platform sovereign deployment

    Control plane and Griffin Zero inference cluster live inside the hull's classified enclave. No cross-tenant traffic, no shared key material, no upstream telemetry.

  2. 02

    Air-gapped sync via approved conduits

    Vulnerability feeds, KEV deltas, and component intelligence flow in via one-way data diodes and approved transfer media. Delta-only, signed, replayable.

  3. 03

    ITAR-aware audit log

    Every action emits a signed event scoped to its classification compartment. Logs export to the platform's existing accreditation toolchain in JSON and CycloneDX.

  4. 04

    Supplier trust packet for primes

    Shipbuilders and combat-system primes get a signed bundle of SBOMs, VEX statements, and attestation history — ready for NATO accreditation submission.

Where the risk lives today

Four risk surfaces your accreditation officer already worries about.

Combat-system AI adversarial input

Track-fusion and contact-classification models ingest sensor data that an adversary can shape. Without provenance, prompt audit, and capability scoping, an on-platform model can be coaxed into mis-classification with no operator-visible failure.

Submarine acoustic-signature library compromise

Acoustic baselines and silencing models are crown-jewel data. A maintainer takeover in a numerical-DSP or ML dependency, or a tampered training set, can silently degrade signature management for the life of the platform.

Sanctioned-component exposure

A transitive dependency from a sanctioned jurisdiction, buried five hops deep in a sonar or comms LRU, becomes an export-control event the moment it ships. Continuous screening, not annual review, is the only viable posture.

On-platform LLM data leakage

Combat-AI assistants that learn from operator interactions can encode classified intent into weights and caches. Sovereign Griffin Zero, deterministic inference, and zero-retention by default close the leakage path.

Current threat landscape

What is actually hitting naval programs this year.

Combat-AI adversarial attacks

Track-fusion and contact-classification models targeted via shaped sensor input. Without provenance and capability scoping, the model becomes the attack surface.

AI governance and on-platform attestation

Sonar / signal-processing library KEV CVEs

Numerical-DSP and codec dependencies harbour exploitable CVEs that ride into combat-management firmware via the build pipeline.

Eagle reachability + KEV prioritisation

Sanctioned-supplier slip-through

A transitive dependency from a sanctioned jurisdiction, buried deep in an LRU SBOM, becomes an export-control event the day the platform sails.

TPRM continuous supplier screening

On-platform compute compromise

Combat-AI inference nodes are kinetic assets. Sovereign Griffin Zero, with SHA-pinned weights and no egress, closes the lateral-movement path from IT to OT.

Sovereign deployment for sensitive workloads

Classified-disclosure SLA gaps

PSIRT workflows that ignore classification compartments either leak Secret data or miss disclosure SLAs. Both outcomes are unacceptable to the accreditation authority.

Comply-with-global-regulations evidence pipeline
Quantified benefits

Quantified benefits for naval programs.

Numbers from sovereign deployments. Same accreditation, same primes, dramatically less six-month evidence hunt.

Metric
Before Safeguard
With Safeguard
NATO cyber audit prep
12 weeks
Continuous
On-platform AI attestation prep
4 weeks
1 day
Air-gapped sync payload
Full
Delta
Tool consolidation
9 vendors
1
Combat-system patch cycle
60 days
7 days
False-positive triage burden
~80%
~5%
Sanctioned-supplier screening
Reactive
Continuous

Evidence at the speed of accreditation.

Talk to the team about sovereign on-platform deployment, STANAG accreditation evidence, and air-gapped delta sync for classified hulls.

Self-healing security runs on Safeguard.

Your first fix PR is minutes away.

No sales call required, even your agent can complete the purchase over MCP.