Solution · Maritime & Ports

Maritime & Ports. Software supply chain security from the bridge to the gate.

Container terminals, shipping lines, port operators, and the logistics partners around them now run on software supplied by a small set of OEMs and integrators. IMO 2021, the EU CER Directive, and national port-cyber regulators turn every shared library — from crane control to customs interface — into an audit obligation. Safeguard makes that obligation a live query against signed evidence.

IMO 2021
Aligned
IEC 62443
Mapped
ISO 27001
Control Library
0
Customer Code In Training
Industry pressures

Four forces converging on the quay.

Flag-state regulators, port-state inspectors, and ransomware crews are collapsing into one continuous evidence requirement.

IMO 2021 cyber resilience

IMO Resolution MSC.428(98) makes cyber-risk management part of the safety management system on every flagged vessel. Continuous evidence across vessel-to-shore software is now an audit obligation, not a working group.

EU CER + national port cyber regs

The EU CER Directive, national rules like the KSA NCA OTCC and Indian DGS guidelines, and US MARSEC pull port operators into the regulated critical-infrastructure perimeter. Annual paper audits will not satisfy any of them.

Customs-data exchange security

Customs brokers, single-window interfaces, and pre-arrival manifests run on software supplied by a small number of vendors. A compromise in that interface is a national-trade incident, not a vendor incident.

OEM concentration on terminal software

A handful of vendors supply the crane control, gate operating, and terminal management systems running the world's container throughput. A shared transitive dependency can cascade across continents.

How Safeguard fits

Capability mapped to terminal-engineering reality.

SBOM for crane + terminal-management software

Every release of terminal-operating, crane control, and gate-system software emits a signed CycloneDX SBOM. Reachability analysis identifies which OEM library is actually wired into production movements.

Reachability-aware OT patching

Patch windows on terminal OT are scarce and expensive. KEV + EPSS + reachability turns the CVE firehose into a ranked, defendable worklist that respects vessel calls and gate schedules.

Signed provenance for GPS/AIS integrations

Navigation and AIS-receiving libraries embedded in vessel and port systems are attested at build time, hash-pinned, and tied to the SBOM that produced them. Spoofing-class libraries surface before they sail.

Vendor risk heatmap across logistics partners

See your single-point-of-failure components across customs brokers, terminal operators, and shipping line software. Concentration risk surfaces at the library level, not the contract level.

Compliance alignment

Frameworks the platform is mapped to.

Pre-mapped control narratives and evidence in the formats your port-state inspector and maritime auditor already accept.

IMO Resolution MSC.428(98)
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
NIS2
US MARSEC
IEC 62443 OT
IMO 2021 Cyber Guidelines
EU CER Directive
US TSA Maritime
Reference architecture

A typical deployment in a regulated port operator.

Port-side DMZ control plane, vessel-to-shore audit log, logistics-partner concentration heatmap, and a customs-interface attestation portal — all under the operator's control.

Step 01

Port-side DMZ control plane

Control plane runs in the port operator's DMZ with one-way ingress from terminal OT. No cross-tenant traffic, no shared key material across operators or shipping lines.

Step 02

Vessel-to-shore audit log

Signed events from vessel scanners and shore-side terminal systems stream into the operator SIEM in JSON and CycloneDX. Chain-of-custody survives a port-state inspection.

Step 03

Logistics concentration heatmap

Cross-vendor dependency rollup across crane, gate, customs, and TOS software. Concentration risk lights up before a shared library compromise ripples through a corridor.

Step 04

Customs-interface attestation

Read-only attestation portal for customs authorities and single-window operators. SBOMs, VEX, signed provenance — exposed on demand, no email attachments.

Where the risk lives today

Four risk surfaces your harbour master already worries about.

Ransomware on terminal-operating systems

NotPetya-class wipers continue to reach terminal-operating systems through corporate IT, taking gate, crane, and yard operations offline. The blast radius is throughput, not just servers.

GPS/AIS spoofing through libraries

Vulnerable AIS-receiving and GNSS libraries embedded in vessel and shore systems can be coerced. A spoofed track changes routing decisions before any operator notices the discrepancy.

Customs-broker software compromise

A compromised customs broker, single-window operator, or pre-arrival manifest provider is an attack on national trade — not just on one ship-owner or terminal.

OEM crane firmware vulnerabilities

Long-lived crane and gate-control firmware with deep transitive dependencies create a 10+ year vulnerability tail. Without signed SBOMs, you cannot tell a benign update from a tampered one.

Current threat landscape

What is actually hitting maritime and ports this year.

Quantified benefits

Quantified benefits for maritime and ports.

Numbers from production deployments. Same OEMs, same terminals, dramatically less spreadsheet.

MetricBefore SafeguardWith Safeguard
Terminal cyber audit prep8 weeks2 days
OT-vendor monitoringQuarterlyContinuous
Vessel-to-shore patch cycle21 days4 days
Alert noise~75%~5%
Tool consolidation6 vendors1
Customs-interface attestation prep2 weeks30 min
Logistics-partner concentrationHiddenMapped

Evidence at the speed of a port-state inspection.

Talk to the team about IMO 2021 evidence pipelines, port cyber audit mappings, and a deployment shape that lives inside your terminal perimeter.