Solution · Air Force

Air Force. Sovereign software supply chain integrity for fighters, drones, and the SCIF squadron.

Air-force operators, fighter-platform OEMs, and drone / UAV programs run on mission software supplied by primes and sub-tier vendors across multiple allied nations. ATO authorisation, IL5 / IL6 enclaves, and mission-system cyber survivability turn every embedded dependency into a continuous evidence requirement. Safeguard delivers that evidence on the airframe, without an egress path.

RMF / STIG
Aligned
IL5 / IL6
Classified Ready
ITAR / EAR
Audit Trail
0
Egress In Air-Gapped Mode
Industry pressures

Four forces converging on the mission-software pipeline.

Accreditation, classified networks, autonomy, and allied policy collapse into one continuous evidence requirement.

ATO authorisation

Authority-to-Operate packages are no longer a one-off binder. The accreditation authority expects continuous attestation against the system security plan, with live SBOM, KEV, and configuration drift evidence per mission load.

Mission-systems cyber survivability

Avionics, mission computers, and weapons interfaces must withstand a contested cyber environment. A CVE in a flight-management or radar dependency is a survivability event, not a backlog item — reachability decides the blast radius.

Drone / UAV adversarial AI

Autonomy stacks ingest sensor data an adversary can shape. Targeting, swarm coordination, and ATR models need provenance, capability scoping, and runtime guardrails — not a model card and a hope.

Allied + AFRL / DARPA cyber rules

US RMF and STIG, UK Def-Stan 05-138, NATO STANAG cyber, and allied counterparts each carve their own evidence shape. Annual paperwork has been replaced by live, queryable control mappings.

How Safeguard fits

Capability mapped to mission-system expectation.

Sovereign Griffin Zero in-platform inference

Mission-system AI runs on the airframe, on customer hardware, with no internet egress. Weights are SHA-pinned and attested at install, and the control plane lives inside the platform's classified enclave.

Signed mission-software SBOM

Every mission load, OFP, and avionics LRU emits a CycloneDX SBOM with signed provenance pinned to the build SHA. ATO renewal becomes a query against the trust packet, not a sixteen-week evidence hunt.

Air-gapped operation for SCIF squadrons

Squadrons operating from SCIFs and forward bases get the full platform offline. Threat intelligence flows in via approved conduits, delta-only, signed, replayable — without any upstream telemetry.

PSIRT for classified disclosures

Disclosure workflows respect classification compartments. Advisories route through cleared channels with cryptographically separated streams for unclassified, restricted, and Secret-grade content.

Compliance alignment

Frameworks the platform is mapped to.

Pre-mapped control narratives and evidence in the formats your authorising official already accepts.

US DoD RMF + STIG
FedRAMP HIGH
DoD IL5 / IL6
UK DASA + Def-Stan 05-138
NATO STANAG cyber
ITAR / EAR
NIST SP 800-171
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Reference architecture

A typical deployment in an air-force program.

Sovereign control plane on customer hardware, signed mission-CI pipeline, air-gapped sync, and an ITAR-compliant audit log out of the box.

Step 01

On-platform sovereign control plane

Control plane and Griffin Zero inference run on customer hardware inside the platform's classified enclave. No cross-tenant traffic, no shared keys, no upstream telemetry.

Step 02

Signed mission-CI pipeline

Every OFP and mission load builds with attested provenance. CycloneDX SBOM, VEX, and SLSA-level metadata travel with the artefact into the squadron's load library.

Step 03

Air-gapped sync

Vulnerability feeds, KEV deltas, and component intelligence flow in via one-way data diodes and approved transfer media. Delta-only, signed, replayable, no egress.

Step 04

ITAR-compliant audit log

Every action emits a signed event scoped to its export-control compartment. Logs export to the program's existing accreditation toolchain in JSON and CycloneDX.

Where the risk lives today

Four risk surfaces your authorising official already worries about.

Mission-system AI adversarial input

ATR, sensor-fusion, and EW classifiers ingest data an adversary can shape. Without provenance, capability scoping, and runtime guardrails, the model becomes the attack surface in a contested environment.

Drone-swarm comms compromise

Mesh-comms and swarm-coordination stacks ride on dependencies that emerge from civilian OSS. A KEV CVE or maintainer takeover can degrade coordination mid-mission with no obvious symptom.

OEM mission-software supply-chain attack

Primes integrate dozens of sub-tier components into a single OFP. A single tampered upstream artefact ships to every squadron in the lineup before anyone notices the blast radius.

Sanctioned-component exposure

A transitive dependency from a sanctioned jurisdiction, buried five hops deep in mission software, becomes an export-control event the day the airframe deploys. Continuous screening is the only viable posture.

Current threat landscape

What is actually hitting air-force programs this year.

Quantified benefits

Quantified benefits for air-force programs.

Numbers from sovereign deployments. Same authorising official, same primes, dramatically less ATO fire drill.

MetricBefore SafeguardWith Safeguard
ATO renewal prep16 weeks2 weeks
Mission-software patch cycle90 days14 days
Sovereign Griffin Zero air-gap deployment0%100% lineup parity
Tool consolidation9 vendors1
False-positive triage burden~80%~5%
ITAR-compliant evidence prep8 weeks1 day
Classified-disclosure SLA hit rate40%100%

Evidence at the speed of the mission.

Talk to the team about sovereign mission-system deployment, RMF / STIG evidence pipelines, and ITAR-aware operation across allied squadrons.